M ICROPROCESSES OF HEALTHCARE TECHNOLOGY IMPLEMENTATION UNDER COMPETING INSTITUTIONAL LOGICS ICIS 2011 Research - in - Progress
نویسنده
چکیده
The healthcare sector is one where two co-existing and competing institutional logics – professional and market logics – occur. Following extant research on institutional logics and institutional work, we propose to understand “what microprocesses and institutional practices do institutional actors enact during the implementation of healthcare IT system? What are the impacts of these practices on project outcomes?” In our study, we were interested to understand how actors within organizations were constrained and enabled by the co-existing and competing institutional logics as they implemented a new integrated health IT project. Health IT implementation projects are especially revelatory episodes since different stakeholders with different logics need to collaborate closely and build integrated solutions to make such projects successful. Furthermore such projects typically aim to support significant organizational and even institutional change occur. It is our goal to understand the interplay between actors and their competing logics within such a context.
منابع مشابه
Competing Logics and Healthcare; Comment on “(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare”
This paper offers a short commentary on the editorial by Mannion and Exworthy. The paper highlights the positive insights offered by their analysis into the tensions between the competing institutional logics of standardization and customization in healthcare, in part manifested in the conflict between managers and professionals, and endorses the plea of the authors for further research in this...
متن کاملPersonalisation - An Emergent Institutional Logic in Healthcare?; Comment on “(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare”
This commentary on the recent think piece by Mannion and Exworthy reviews their core arguments, highlighting their suggestion that recent forces for personalization have emerged which may counterbalance the strong standardization wave which has been evident in many healthcare settings and systems over the last two decades. These forces for personalization can take very different forms. The comm...
متن کامل(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare
Recent years have witnessed a parallel and seemingly contradictory trend towards both the standardization and the customization of healthcare and medical treatment. Here, we explore what is meant by ‘standardization’ and ‘customization’ in healthcare settings and explore the implications of these changes for healthcare delivery. We frame the paradox of these divergent and opposing factors in te...
متن کاملChanging Perspectives: Institutional Logics of Adoption and Use of Health Information Technology
In this study, we evaluate the adoption of IT resources within the U.S. healthcare system from the perspective of institutional logics. Our analysis focuses on the impact that increased use of electronic health records (EHR) systems and other health IT have on the interactions between diverse stakeholders and the values and objectives driving EHR adoption. Our findings suggest a broader range o...
متن کاملIt Takes Two to Tango: Customization and Standardization as Colluding Logics in Healthcare; Comment on “(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare”
The healthcare context is characterized with new developments, technologies, ideas and expectations that are continually reshaping the frontline of care delivery. Mannion and Exworthy identify two key factors driving this complexity, ‘standardization’ and ‘customization,’ and their apparent resulting paradox to be negotiated by healthcare professionals, managers and policy makers. However, whil...
متن کامل